Marcos Castro Fabra vs Peter Alam Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 14 Jul at 12:59 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Castro Fabra vs P. Alam

ESP
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Fabra 1 - 0 Alam
They have played 3 sets in total, with Marcos Castro Fabra winning 2 and Peter Alam winning 1. The last match between Marcos Castro Fabra and Peter Alam was at the M25 Castelo Branco, 14-07-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Marcos Castro Fabra getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-7(1) 10-6.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Fabra | 1 |
| Alam | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) M25 Castelo Branco(07-14-25)
M. C. Fabra vs P. Alam H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 50.00% (11-11) | Career Total W/L | 51.49% (52-49) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. C. Fabra vs P. Alam Match Preview:
- Second Serve Strength: Fabra surpasses Alam in recent second serve performance, winning 50% of the points as compared to Alam's 46.18%. How crucial is this advantage? Very, as it is highly correlated with match prediction success.
- Return Game Superiority: In recent matches, Fabra dominates Alam in return games, securing 59.09% of points on opponents' second serves and 44% on first serves, while Alam only manages 49.13% and 24.59% respectively. Does this give Fabra the upper hand? Statistically, it aligns with a favored position.
- Under Pressure: When facing breakpoints, Alam has a slight edge, saving 54.22% compared to Fabra's 40%. Could this be pivotal? It's a notable edge for Alam in tense moments.
- Match Outcomes: Alam's Win/Loss record (52.73%) over the past year slightly outshines Fabra's 46.67%. Does this indicate a consistent performance edge? Yes, although marginal.
- Surface Preference: Fabra's best play is on Hard surfaces (55% win rate), while Alam prefers Indoor Hard (54%). Who struggles more on Hard? Alam, who has a lower win rate (51%).
- Event Level Experience: Both players typically compete in $10K ITF tournaments, with Alam holding a slight edge in win percentage. Does this reflect a competitive level difference? Minimal, as the event level is the same.
- Opponent Quality: Fabra has faced marginally higher-ranked opponents (average rank 159.4) compared to Alam (average rank 171.67). What does this suggest? Fabra's experience with slightly tougher competition could be beneficial.
- Deciding Sets: Fabra has a better record in deciding sets at 50% success, whereas Alam stands at 47%. Could this be critical in a close match? Potentially decisive.
- Breakpoint Conversion: Fabra has excelled in converting breakpoints with a 66.67% rate versus Alam's 33.33%. How important is this for match dynamics? Very, as it could dictate pivotal game outcomes.
Editorial Prediction (July 14, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Fabra and Alam promises an intriguing contest. Fabra's stronger second serve performance provides an edge in service games, contributing significantly to potential match success.
Fabra's dominance in return games further enhances their prospects, especially with higher conversion rates on both first and second serves. Meanwhile, Alam displays resilience under pressure with higher breakpoint savings, yet Fabra's conversion efficiency poses a distinct challenge.
Considering past performances, Alam showcases a slightly better win percentage. However, Fabra's experiences against tougher opponents and a solid deciding set record offer counterbalance.
Ultimately, Fabra's superior return statistics and breakpoint conversion indicate a probable victory over Alam in this match.
Marcos Castro Fabra vs Peter Alam Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. C. Fabra vs P. Alam H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 23 | Games Won | 19 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
| 11 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 2:17:22 | Average Match Time | 2:17:22 |
| 57% (63/111) | 1st Serve % | 52% (44/84) |
| 57% (36/63) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (27/44) |
| 46% (22/48) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (19/40) |
| 100% (4/4) | Break Pts Won % | 31% (4/13) |
| 45% (38/84) | Return Points Win % | 48% (53/111) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. C. Fabra Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | w/o | ||
R2 | L | 6-4 7-6(2) | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 7-6(5) | ||
Q3 | W | 7-6(5) 6-7(1) 10-6 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-4 4-6 10-8 | ||
P. Alam Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 5-2 ret. | ||
R2 | L | 6-4 7-6(5) | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-1 | ||
Q3 | W | 7-5 5-7 10-7 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-0 6-0 | ||

M. C. Fabra vs P. Alam Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50.00% (11/11) | YTD Win/Loss | 51.49% (52/49) |
| 47.92% (23/25) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.42% (125/109) |
| 48.96% (236/246) | Games Win/Loss | 51.54% (1208/1136) |
| 57.14% (8/6) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.63% (40/39) |
| 37.50% (3/5) | Clay Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57.14% (12/9) |
| 0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0.19 |
| 7 | Aces Total | 223 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 39 | Total Double Faults | 198 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 214.64 | Average Opponent Rank | 184.93 |
| 59% (458/781) | 1st Serve % | 56% (1642/2952) |
| 61% (280/458) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (1155/1642) |
| 40% (128/323) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (610/1310) |
| 34% (21/62) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (103/257) |
| 38% (261/686) | Return Points Win % | 38% (1136/2991) |
| 50.00% (11/11) | Futures W/L | 51.49% (52/49) |
| 50% (11/22) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (50/96) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 38% (3/8) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 68% (17/25) |
| 75% (3/4) | Deciding Set Win % | 37% (13/35) |
| 92% (12/11) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 79% (56/44) |
| 8% (12/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 21% (56/12) |
| 0% (10/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (45/8) |